Implementasi pemetaan koneksi dengan teknik pbr (policy-based routing) menggunakan mikrotik

UNSPECIFIED (2019) Implementasi pemetaan koneksi dengan teknik pbr (policy-based routing) menggunakan mikrotik. Other thesis, Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto.

Preview	Text ABSTRACT.pdf - Accepted Version Download (10kB) | Preview
Preview	Text ABSTRAK.pdf - Accepted Version Download (11kB) | Preview
	Text COVER.pdf - Accepted Version Download (618kB)
Preview	Text BAB I.pdf - Accepted Version Download (20kB) | Preview
	Text BAB II.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (181kB)
	Text BAB III.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)
	Text BAB IV.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (161kB)
Preview	Text BAB V.pdf - Accepted Version Download (15kB) | Preview
Preview	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf - Accepted Version Download (13kB) | Preview
Preview	Text LAMPIRAN.pdf - Accepted Version Download (289kB) | Preview

Abstract

Density of internet access as a result of the many users can interfere with the smooth access to internet services. There is a need for network management, to provide maximum internet services to users Application of PBR (policy based routing) can be a solution to overcome the dense traffic internet services to users. With the implementation of PBR, the distribution of traffic loads or load balancing with better control of ISP links that will be used to distribute traffic. There are four scenarios in the design of PBR. The first scenario is failover configuration using 2 internet links, the second scenario is PBR and failover 2 client groups, the third scenario is separation of domestic lines (IIX) and international lines (IIX), scenario four is separation of internet services with online games. All four design scenarios apply different routing tables. The network testing is in the form of traceroute, tourch, and QoS data collection (quality of services). There are four parameters tested quality of services which are delay, jitter, packet loss, and throughput. The results of the test, get an average delay value in scenario 1 is 0.18 ms, scenario 2 group A is 0.30 ms, scenario 2 group B is 0.33 ms, scenario 3 is 0.20 ms, and scenario 4 is 0.18 ms. The average results of jitter in scenario 1 is 3.30 ms, scenario 2 group A is 0.59 ms, scenario 2 group B is 0.77 ms, scenario 3 is 0.54 ms, and scenario 4 is 0.50 ms. The average value of packet loss in scenario 1 is 0.93%, scenario 2 group A is 1.51%, scenario 2 group B is 1.17%, scenario 3 is 0.05%, and scenario 4 is 0, 01%. The average results of throughput in scenario 1 is 34.29 Mbps, scenario 2 group A is 41.43 Mbps, scenario 2 group B is 40.56 Mbps, scenario 3 is 57.58 Mbps, and scenario 4 is 62.47 Mbps. In testing the network quality of each scenario determined to get good results with the reference THIPON standardization. Keywords: Internet, PBR (Policy-Based Routing), QoS (Quality of Services).

Actions (login required)

View Item